Europe
Finland
Global Rank #9Good88% data confidence
68
Composite Score
📊Relocation Scores
Safety91/100
Healthcare100/100
Education84/100
Career87/100
Lifestyle73/100
Infrastructure89/100
Affordability21/100
💡Quick Summary
✅ High safety — good for families and solo travellers
✅ Strong healthcare system
⚠️ Higher cost — est. $2950/mo
✅ Good infrastructure and internet connectivity
✅ Good career and job market opportunities
💵Cost of Living
Estimated monthly cost
$2950
per month · USD
Cost Index
80
Rent Index
34
Grocery Index
34
Transport Index
18
Utilities Index
34
🎯Score Breakdown
🛡️
Safety
91
🏥
Healthcare
100
🎓
Education
84
💼
Career
87
🌿
Lifestyle
73
🏗️
Infrastructure
89
💰
Affordability
21
🏛️Government, Language & Culture
Government
🏛️ Parliamentary Republic
Languages
🗣️ Finnish, Swedish
Local Language
Not Required
for daily life
Major Religions
🕌 Christianity
ℹ️ Lutheran majority; secular in practice. Strong English proficiency
🏙️Cities in Finland(1 cities)
🌐Economy & Stability
Currency
€ EUR
Euro
1 USD equals
0.8632 EUR
Updated 6/15/2026
1 EUR equals
$1.1585
USD
Political Stability
🔵
Stable
Score: 0.83
ℹ️ Understanding the Political Stability Score
Source: World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) — 2025 Revision (Kaufmann & Kraay, 2024 Update, last updated November 2024). The indicator is officially titled "Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism" — not democratic strength.
Active democracies with frequent elections, protests and public debate may score lower as these are sometimes classified as "social unrest." Scores also rely on perception-based surveys from global business-risk consultancies and think tanks, which can sometimes carry specific institutional biases compared to objective, which may not reflect ground reality. Use this as one signal among many, not as a definitive verdict on a country's governance and stability.
Active democracies with frequent elections, protests and public debate may score lower as these are sometimes classified as "social unrest." Scores also rely on perception-based surveys from global business-risk consultancies and think tanks, which can sometimes carry specific institutional biases compared to objective, which may not reflect ground reality. Use this as one signal among many, not as a definitive verdict on a country's governance and stability.